The High Court clearly said that this was not a coincidence, it was a deep conspiracy to scare the country:

News India Live, Digital Desk: Do you remember that day of 13th December 2023? When suddenly yellow smoke spread inside the new Parliament building and there was chaos. That scene shocked the entire country. Now a big update has come in that matter, and this update is a lesson for those who were calling it “just a protest”.

Delhi High Court accused in this case Neelam Azad The things that have been said while rejecting the bail plea are very serious. The stand of the court is telling that the judges have seen this case as an attack on the sovereignty of the country.

‘Can’t be just a coincidence’
When Neelam Azad’s lawyer argued that it was just a demonstration and her intention was not to harm anyone, Justice Swarn Kanta Sharma rejected it outright. The court said in a very strict tone that no one should enter a place like Parliament, where the country’s MPs are sitting, with smoke canisters. “Coincidence” Or “Small protest” Cannot be done.

The High Court believes that this entire incident was a well thought out and deep conspiracy (Well-planned Conspiracy). The objective behind this was clear – to stop the functioning of Parliament and create an atmosphere of ‘fear’ across the country.

The aim was to embarrass the country
The court has written a very important thing in its order. He said that the method of the accused was such that the aim was not only to intimidate the MPs but also to embarrass India in front of the whole world. Parliament is the temple of our democracy, and doing such a thing by entering there is not a child’s play. This cannot be taken lightly.

The judge made it clear that the Constitution gives you the right to protest, but no one has the right to spread terror or fear by entering the Parliament. This incident is very close to the definition of terrorism because its psychological impact was very deep.

I will have to stay in jail for now
Lawyers for accused Neelam Azad had argued that since the investigation has been completed, she should get bail. But police and government lawyers said that there is a case against them under serious sections like UAPA (Unlawful Activities Prevention Act). And the kind of digital evidence (mobiles etc.) that was destroyed shows how vicious this group was.

Overall, the Delhi High Court has made it clear that there is no hope of any relief for any accused in this security breach case. The message of the court is clear that playing with the security of the country cannot be forgiven as a mere mischief.