look news india
Jaunpur 23 October (HIST). Civil Judge Junior Division of Civil Court on Wednesday rejected the 37C application filed by Sunni Waqf Board on Jaunpur Atala Masjid in the court of Civil Judge JD Sudha Sharma. Also, the date for hearing the written statement and commission report has been given on 16th November.
Waqf Board and Peace Committee vs. Swaraj Vahini had filed a petition in the court regarding Atala Temple, in which Swaraj Vahini had included in the petition the historical heritage of the district, Atala Masjid, which was formerly a temple, on which the Waqf Board had complained that This mosque is the property of the Waqf Board and this hearing cannot be held in this court.
On which advocate Suresh Chandra Pathak debated the Civil Judge of Civil Court, Jaunpur. Talking to Hindusthan News representative in this matter, Swaraj Vahini's advocate Suresh Chandra Pathak said that the application was filed on behalf of the mosque and this matter is not worth hearing. In 1991, when the divided structure of Ayodhya was demolished, it was the government of Narasimha Rao. The Muslim side had given this application on the basis that whatever religion mosques were there before 1947, they would remain the same.
Which has not been accepted by the court. That is why it is not accepted that from the time when we Hindus and those who believe in Sanatan Dharma were evicted from this temple, Atala Mata is worshiped in every house. It is not the property of the Waqf Board because at that time whatever external invader They had come and attacked. The invader has no right claim unless he has any ownership rights on it. On this basis, the court did not accept his point. The court said that during the time of the invader Shahjahan, where his name was registered in Khatauni, our Had ownership rights. At that time there was no provision for registering names on Khatauni. This arrangement was made during the time of Shahjahan, at that time it was his people who ruled and all were Islamic kings. Later the British came. We never got the opportunity, we used to worship her sitting in our homes considering her as the symbol of the Goddess. Even during marriages, gods were invoked mentally. On the basis of that, we used to worship him and the court has given this decision regarding this.
