look news india
The troubles of actor Rajpal Yadav, one of the most favorite and veteran villain-cum-comedy actors of Hindi cinema, have increased a lot. In a major blow to the actor, the Delhi High Court has completely upheld the jail sentence awarded by the lower court in seven separate check bounce cases dating back years. Considering the seriousness of the matter, the High Court has clearly refused to interfere in any way in the decision of the lower court.
The single bench of Justice Swarnakanta Sharma, while hearing the final case of the case, termed actor Rajpal Yadav’s conduct in the court as extremely suspicious. The court ordered that the sentences of all the seven cases registered against him will run concurrently, under which he will have to serve the remaining 3 months of simple jail sentence. However, the Honorable Court, adopting a humanitarian approach, has given additional time of 2 months to Rajpal Yadav to challenge this tough decision in the Supreme Court.
Huge fine of ₹7.35 crore in 7 cases, complainant will get the money
The court has not only upheld the jail sentence but also imposed a heavy financial penalty on the actor. Delhi High Court has imposed a fine of Rs 1.05 crore in each case of check bounce. In this way, Rajpal Yadav is accused in total seven cases. Rs 7.35 crore A total heavy fine of Rs.
According to the final written order of the High Court, a huge amount of Rs 1 crore 4 lakh 75 thousand to be recovered from each case will be given directly to the complainant company as compensation, while the remaining Rs 25-25 thousand per case will be deposited in the state treasury as per the court process.
Controversy started in 2010: Loan of ₹5 crore was taken for the film ‘Ata Pata Lapata’
Even today, Rajpal Yadav rules the hearts of millions of viewers due to his excellent comic timing and unmatched acting. From Bhool Bhulaiyaa’s ‘Natwar’ to small characters in many films, he made them immortal. But this real-life legal dispute paints a very scary picture of the financial risks associated with filmmaking in Bollywood.
The script of this entire controversy was written in the year 2010, when Rajpal Yadav, as a director-producer, started his ambitious sports-comedy film. ‘Missing address’ Had decided to make. For the production and budget of the film, he consulted a reputed Delhi company ‘Murali Projects Pvt. Ltd.’ Rs 5 crore Had taken a business loan of Rs. This film, released in 2012, proved to be a huge flop at the box office. The result was that the actor could not return the original amount of the loan within the stipulated time limit.
How did check bounce become a serious criminal case?
As time passed, interest and penalty kept getting added on this loan of Rs 5 crore, due to which the total outstanding amount increased to around Rs. 9 crore rupees Reached beyond. To repay the loan, several checks were issued to Murali Projects in the name of Rajpal Yadav and, according to some media reports, his wife also. But when the company deposited these checks in the bank for clearance, all the checks bounced one by one due to insufficient funds in the account.
After this the loan company filed a complaint against the actor and his wife. Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act Seven separate criminal cases were registered under this. Let us tell you that under Indian law, if a check given to repay a legitimate liability bounces, then it is not just a civil default but is considered a serious criminal offence, which has strict provisions of rigorous imprisonment and fine up to double the check amount.
Long legal journey from lower court to high court (2018 to 2026)
-
April 2018: A Delhi magistrate court had convicted Rajpal Yadav and his wife on the basis of all the evidence and witnesses and sentenced the actor to 6 months simple imprisonment.
-
Year 2019: The Sessions Court also upheld the decision of the Magistrate Court and rejected his appeal, after which Rajpal Yadav approached the Delhi High Court for relief.
-
From 2019 to 2026: During the long hearing over the last several years, the Delhi High Court gave Rajpal Yadav several interim opportunities to improve his financial position and repay the outstanding amount in instalments. But due to repeatedly breaking the promises made in the court and the terms of the agreement, the High Court finally took a tough stance towards them.
‘Sir, what should I do, I don’t have money…’ Actor became emotional in court
When the court approved the sentence in the last moments of the hearing in the Delhi High Court on 10 July 2026, actor Rajpal Yadav looked very emotional and helpless. With a very heavy heart he said in front of the judge in the court room, “Sir, what should I do now? I really don’t have any money. I can’t think of any other solution.” This statement of the actor makes it clear that this matter is no longer just a court battle, but is linked to a very serious financial and personal crisis in his life.
Experts believe that this case of Rajpal Yadav is a big lesson for all those small producers and artists of Bollywood who take the risk of making films by taking huge loans without proper financial management and risk assessment. At present, after this final order of the High Court, Rajpal Yadav may have to go to jail, but as his last legal hope, he has the option of filing a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the country’s largest court ‘Supreme Court’ within the next 60 days.