look news india
News India Live, Digital Desk: In one of the most exciting moments of IPL 2025, every cricket fan had this question-did Jitesh Sharma run out at non-strayer and? Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB) star wicketkeeper batsman Lucknow Super Giants (LSG), chasing the big target against Lucknow Super Giants (LSG) narrowly escaped being dismissed, and the drama came to light in such a way that both the spectator and the expert were surprised. Let us know deeply what exactly happened, what important rules were included, and why RCB’s Jitesh Sharma remained not out despite the rapid effort of the run out.
Dramatic moments: Jeetesh Sharma’s almost run-out
This is a big match of IPL The 17th over was when stress was at its peak. RCB was chasing a huge target of 228 runs against LSG, and each wicket was precious. On the final ball of the over, Digvesh Rathi of LSG made a sharp attempt to run Jitesh Sharma at the non-stray end. The television replay revealed that Sharma was actually outside the crease when Rathi fell Bells.
However, what happened after this was unexpected. LSG captain and an experienced wicketkeeper Rishabh Pant withdrew the appeal for the run-out before the decisive decision of the third umpire. The move saved Jitesh Sharma from being dismissed and kept RCB’s hopes of victory alive. As soon as the stress was over, the audience breathed a sigh of relief and played applause.
Why would Jitesh Sharma be not out without the removal of Pant?
Rishabh Pant’s game spirit was commendable, but the rules of cricket were also in favor of Jitesh Sharma staying at the crease. According to the MCC cricket rules, especially Rules 38.3.1 and its sub-blocks, the non-strayer can be run out only when certain conditions related to the bowler’s bowling action are fulfilled.
What does MCC law say
- According to Rule 38.3.1, the moment the ball comes into the game, from the time the bowler is expected to leave the ball, the non-strayer can be run out when the bowler is out of the crease.
- Rule 38.3.1.1 defines the “expected release” as a moment when the bowler’s hand reaches the highest point when swinging the ball.
- Rule 38.3.1.2 makes it clear that if the bowler has already crossed this point, it is not valid to try run-out at non-strayer ends.
In this incident, Digvesh Rathi had completed his bowling action before dropping the bails or exiting the popping crease. This violated the conditions required for a valid non-strayer run-out attempt. Therefore, even though Rishabh Pant has not withdrawn the appeal, the third umpire would have been bound to give not out to Jitesh Sharma as per the rules.
Rishabh Pant’s sportsmanship deserves praise
In the heat of an important match of the IPL, where every run and wickets could change the outcome of the game, Pant’s decision to withdraw the appeal showed a tremendous sportsmanship and the spirit of cricket. When the bets are so high, it is rare to take so much fairness by the captains.
Pant’s move not only maintained the integrity of the game, but also boosted the morale of the team. After the return, hugging between Pant and Sharma was a poignant moment, which was a symbol of cricket beyond the fierce competition.
Jitesh Sharma: From narrowly escape to the match winner
The dramatic moment turned into a victory story for Jitesh Sharma and RCB. Riding on his patience and skills, Sharma brilliantly took over the innings and won the RCB with 8 balls remaining. His innings was a mixture of smart shot selection, stable race between wickets and great performance under pressure.
The run -out incident proved to be a decisive turn – it inspired Sharma and his team to make more efforts, instead of breaking the speed of RCB, which eventually won the match. The performance further strengthened Sharma as an important player in RCB’s lineup.