look news india
Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal's troubles are increasing day by day. When the Delhi High Court refused to grant bail regarding the alleged leaker policy and money laundering, now the CBI has come into action in this case. The CBI has arrested Arvind Kejriwal in this case. So let's know on what basis the CBI raided Arvind Kejriwal.
Permission sought to question Kejriwal
The investigating agency said that we should be allowed to take Kejriwal into custody and interrogate him. Kejriwal's lawyer Vikram Chaudhary has called the Chief Minister's detention a matter of concern.
CBI said we have evidence
The CBI has told the court that they have enough evidence to arrest Kejriwal. According to the CBI, on March 16, 2021, a liquor businessman was contacted, whom Kejriwal wanted to meet on the liquor policy. K Kavitha and Maguntha Reddy met on March 20. It further said that Aam Aadmi Party's communication in-charge Vijay Nair was asked to coordinate the meeting.
delivered the file even during lockdown
The CBI said that when the corona epidemic was at its peak, a team from the South came to Delhi by private plane despite the Covid lockdown. Bucchibabu gave the report to Vijay Nair and then the file reached Sisodia.
100 crore cash was given- CBI
CBI told the court that we have sufficient evidence about the Goa trial. There is proof of who gave money to whom. CBI has also said in the basis of arrest that the money given for the election was spent. The liquor policy was changed on the behest of South Group. CBI said that Rs 100 crore was given in advance by South Group so that the profit margin increases from 6 to 12. All amounts are paid in cash. CBI said that we have been able to trace about Rs 44 crore and also able to find out how this money reached Goa and how it was used.
LG Office's suggestions were ignored
Abhishek Boinpalli sent the report to Manish Sisodia through Vijay Nair. Sisodia's secretary C Arvind typed the report and it was submitted to his camp office (CM). When this report went to the LG office, it was considered and 7 questions were raised but never discussed. The only suggestion from the Lt Governor's office was that it should be sent through a group of ministers and no consideration was given to it.
