look news india
Mumbai: The High Court has reprimanded the tenant who did not leave the house even after the rental agreement ended. The tenant requested a stay of the eviction notice, but the request was invalidated and the application was withdrawn, indicating that the application was denied. The approach adopted by the court requires tenants to vacate the premises as soon as the tenancy agreement is completed.
Dilip Trivedi, owner of a house in Borivali West, served an eviction notice to his tenant under Section 24 of the House Rent Control Act. Trivedi filed a case in the Konkan Divisional Board after the tenant did not hand over possession of the house. The board ordered the tenant to vacate the house. The tenant appealed against this to the Divisional Commissioner. During the pendency of the appeal, an application was filed in the High Court requesting a stay of the notice given to the tenant. Justice on this. Sandeep Marne and Nya. The vacation bench heard Neela Gokhale.
The court rejected the tenant's request to stay the notice, considering the landlord's plea that the tenant has no right to stay in the rented house after the completion of the rental agreement, Trivedi said in 2016 Had given his flat on rent to Dushyant Soni's family. In six years, Soni paid the remaining rent amount of Rs 7.88 lakh in check and flat amount of Rs. A fake document was prepared saying that it would be sold for Rs 95 lakh.
Trivedi had lodged an FIR in this case. On the basis of that, the police arrested Soni. Trivedi gave an eviction notice to Soni and filed a case in the Konkan Divisional Board.