look news india
The courts of the national capital Delhi often come face to face with such cases whose cruelty and horror make even humanity shudder. One such extremely horrifying and shocking case had echoed some time ago from the lower court of Delhi to the corridors of the High Court, which had put the society and justice system of the entire country in deep crisis. In this sensational case, an accused, showing extreme cruelty, had forcibly tattooed the word ‘rapist’ on the chest of the victim, which was an act that shocked human sensibilities. When the case was being heard in the trial court, the accused was sentenced to extremely harsh and long imprisonment for this heinous crime, but when the case reached the Delhi High Court through appeal and the court deeply considered all the aspects, evidence and legal technicalities related to the case, a shocking decision came out which no one had expected. After assessing all the circumstances, the High Court gave relief to the cruel accused and reduced his sentence, after which this decision has sparked a heated debate in legal and social circles.
This heart-wrenching incident came to light when a victim reached the local police station and narrated her ordeal and filed a case of cruelty, assault and sexual exploitation against the accused. The victim alleged that the accused not only subjected her to severe physical torture and heinous acts of rape, but also forcibly got derogatory words written on her body to tarnish her dignity and completely break her mentally. Such cruelty was a slap on the face of modern civilized society and when the police filed a charge sheet and started the trial in the court, the prosecution strongly demanded that it be classified as the rarest of rare crimes. On the basis of the horrific marks found on the victim’s body and the medical report, the lower court had convicted the accused and sentenced him to a heavy and long jail term so that a strong message could be sent to the society that such brutality against women will not be tolerated.
When this sensational case reached the bench of judges of the Delhi High Court under the appeal process of the High Court, the lawyers of both the parties strongly presented their arguments before the court. Defense lawyers argued that although the act was highly condemnable, the antecedents of the accused, the circumstances at the time of the incident and the technical aspects of the nature of the crime should be considered while deciding the punishment. On the other hand, the government counsel emphasized that a criminal with such a despicable and mentally deranged mindset should not be considered entitled to any leniency as he had attempted to trample the dignity of a woman forever. The High Court carefully studied the statements of all the witnesses, medical evidence and forensic reports and examined whether the sentence awarded by the lower court was in strict accordance with the established principles and provisions of law or whether it left some scope for adjustments.
After lengthy legal debate and analysis of evidence, the Delhi High Court in its detailed judgment made it clear that although the crime of the accused is extremely serious and condemnable, the purpose of punishment under the rules of criminal jurisprudence is not only to take revenge but also to leave scope for improvement. The court, taking into account the circumstances of the case and certain technical arguments, modified and reduced the original sentence awarded by the trial court. After this decision, strong reactions were seen from women’s organizations and human rights activists, who believed that showing leniency towards such brutes could send a wrong message to the society. On the other hand, legal experts also said that the courts do not always give decisions on the basis of emotions or public anger, rather they take just decisions based on the sections of the law, solid evidence and within the constitutional framework, even if that decision sometimes seems uncomfortable to the people.
This case is not limited to just one person’s crime and his punishment, but it raises serious questions to our entire judicial and social fabric as to what should be the definition of justice in violent crimes against women. Whenever a court softens the punishment of a big criminal, it is natural for the general public to question whether the law is actually able to provide complete protection and justice to the victims or not. This historic and celebrated judgment has proved how challenging it is for the judiciary to follow every section of the law in every case, where emotions are on one side and legal evidence and procedures are on the other. In the times to come, both society and law together need to be more sensitive and strict in setting higher standards of justice in such cases so that recurrence of such inhuman incidents can be prevented.