In the film industry, someone or the other is always in the headlines. Choreographer Remo D'Souza is in the news right now. Prayagraj High Court has reprimanded Remo in an 8-year-old case, so naturally this will be discussed. The court rejected the choreographer's petition and said, do not give any relief. Know the whole matter.
Verdict came on 8 year old case
Prayagraj High Court on Friday rejected the petition in an 8-year-old case related to Bollywood choreographer Remo D'Souza. While hearing the case, the court said that the charge sheet has not been challenged in the petition and in its absence, relief cannot be given. This decision of the court has given a big blow to Remo.
What is the matter?
This case is not of today but is eight years old. Remo is accused of cheating Ghaziabad businessman Satyendra Tyagi by luring him. According to the report, it was said that Remo invested Rs 5 crore in the film by luring Satyendra with the promise of returning Rs 10 crore in a year, but when Satyendra asked for his money back, the choreographer threatened Satyendra with underworld don Prasa Pujari.
to deceive by seduction
After this move of Ramo, businessman Satyendra had to take legal recourse and he filed a case of fraud in Ghaziabad's Sihani Gate police station 8 years ago. Ramo filed an application in the High Court to cancel the case. Now after 8 years the decision has come and Ramo has not got any relief.
When was the case registered?
Let us tell you that Satyendra Tyagi had filed this case against Bollywood choreographer Remo D'Souza on 16 December 2016. However, Remo was threatened by Prasad Pujari and the police also investigated the matter. After investigation, the police filed a chargesheet against Prasad Pujari and Remo in Ghaziabad trial court under sections 420, 406 and 386 of the IPC. After the chargesheet was filed, the trial court issued summons to Ramon. According to which Remo had to appear in court. However, now Ramo's lawyer told the court that the allegations against Ramo are false and he is being framed. On which Satyendra's lawyers opposed his argument and after this the court rejected the choreographer's petition.