look news india
New Delhi: In December last year, The Times filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft alleging copyright infringement. A new revelation in the case came when the CEO of OpenAI denied these lawsuits and said that the publication had hired someone to hack ChatGPT.
Let us tell you that the creator of ChatGPIT has asked a federal court to dismiss parts of The New York Times' lawsuit. In this he said that the newspaper has 'hacked' the company's AI tool to show misleading results. So they used it for copyright litigation.
Additionally, in a filing in Manhattan federal court, OpenAI said that the Times does not meet its strict journalistic standards. The truth is beyond what has come to light in this case.
To prove its point, the Times hacked OpenAI's products and paid someone to do so.
However, the company said they may require thousands of attempts to produce extremely good results.
Also the newspaper targeted the bug using only misleading signals. Doing so is a clear violation of OpenAI's terms of use.
Why was the case registered?
Now the question arises that why was this case initiated? Let us tell you that in December, the New York Times had filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft for violating its copyright.
The lawsuit claims the company used newspaper content to train its large language models (LLMs) – the technology built into its AI chatbots. For this the company neither took any approval from the newspaper nor made any payment.
Responding to this, the company's CEO Sam Altman said that he is not concerned about the lawsuit.
“We are training at the New York Times,” Altman said at the World Economic Forum in January. [एआई] “We are ready for that, but it is not our priority.” He said that OpenAI does not need its data.