If Akhilesh Yadav is a Hindu and believes in Sanatan then he must go to Ram temple.


In the politics of Uttar Pradesh, the war of words regarding Sanatan Dharma, religious faith and temples has once again reached its peak. This time, State Tourism and Culture Minister Jaiveer Singh has made a sharp and direct political attack on Samajwadi Party National President and former Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav. Issuing a statement, Minister Jaiveer Singh has bluntly said that if Akhilesh Yadav considers himself a Hindu and has deep faith in Sanatan culture, then he should go to Ayodhya without any hesitation and have darshan of Lord Shri Ramlala. Ever since his statement came to light, the stir in the political corridors of Uttar Pradesh has intensified and verbal spats have started once again between the ruling party and the opposition. In this detailed report, we will tell you what else Minister Jaiveer Singh has said in his statement and what meaning is being derived from it in the politics of the state.

Debate on the political meaning of Tourism Minister Jaiveer Singh’s statement and Sanatan faith

Jaiveer Singh, Minister of Tourism and Culture in Uttar Pradesh Government, is known for his outspoken statements. While talking to the media, he made this sharp comment while taking a dig at the recent statements of Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and his working style. The minister said that the faith of the majority of the country’s population is related to Lord Shri Ram and Sanatan Dharma, in such a situation, why are the leaders who claim themselves to be Hindus, avoiding going there to pay obeisance after the construction of the grand Ram temple in Ayodhya? He alleged that due to political profit-loss and appeasement politics, many opposition leaders are afraid to express their faith openly. Political analysts believe that BJP is once again trying to strengthen the political ground by giving edge to the issues of Hindutva and Sanatan, so that the opposition parties can be cornered on the ideological front.

Questions are being raised continuously on the strategy of Samajwadi Party and Akhilesh Yadav.

Since the time of Ram Mandir Pran Pratistha ceremony, various types of discussions have been taking place in political circles regarding the stand of Samajwadi Party. On one hand, the SP leadership has never shied away from expressing its faith in Lord Ram, on the other hand, to avoid the siege of opposition parties, it has tried to give the message of ‘Sabka Saath’ instead of openly following any one agenda. BJP leaders’ repeatedly raising questions as to why opposition leaders are not going to the temple is actually being considered as part of a deliberate strategy to send an ideological message among the public. The ruling party believes that the confusion of the opposition parties on the issue of Sanatan and Ram Mandir shows their lack of ideological clarity, which can be directly benefited during the elections.

Increasing influence and reactions of religion and culture in the politics of Uttar Pradesh

The politics of Uttar Pradesh has always revolved around caste, religion and ideological issues, but in the last few years, the political weight of religious issues has increased further after the construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya and the cultural revival of Kashi-Mathura. After this latest statement of Minister Jaiveer Singh, there is every possibility of a counterattack from the spokespersons and leaders of Samajwadi Party. SP has always maintained that faith is a personal matter and God belongs to everyone, hence there should be no politics on this. However, amidst the upcoming elections and political environment, such statements of the leaders are heating up the atmosphere in the state, and this issue may gain further prominence in the coming days.